- All Devices
- Cardiology
- ECG-AI Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) 12-Lead algorithm (1020)
Cardiology · Pulmonary hypertension early detection from 12-lead ECG
ECG-AI Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) 12-Lead algorithm (1020)
Anumana, Inc.
The first algorithm cleared for pulmonary-hypertension detection from a standard 12-lead ECG, built by Anumana — the nference–Mayo Clinic venture — with Janssen Research & Development, and cleared under a pulmonary-hypertension-specific FDA product code created for it. The development science is genuinely strong: a peer-reviewed Mayo cohort of roughly 259,000 patients (European Respiratory Journal 2024) reporting an AUC of 0.92 at diagnosis and 0.88 at external validation at Vanderbilt, with meaningful discrimination six to eighteen months before clinical diagnosis. But every published study is retrospective and manufacturer-authored, the 21,066-patient five-system validation behind the clearance has not yet surfaced in a peer-reviewed venue, and the regulatory footprint is a single US clearance from March 2026. A promising, well-credentialled entrant that has not yet accumulated the independent evidence or market history that carries devices to two marks.
Performance Metrics
Clinical Evidence
The evidence base is young and, so far, entirely manufacturer-authored and retrospective. The pivotal publication (DuBrock HM, Wagner TE, Carlson K, et al., European Respiratory Journal 2024;64(1):2400192) describes the PH Early Detection Algorithm (PH-EDA), a convolutional neural network trained on ECG voltage-time data from Mayo Clinic: 39,823 PH-likely patients and 219,404 controls, labelled from right heart catheterisation or echocardiography and split 48/12/40 into training, validation and test sets. On diagnostic ECGs the algorithm reached an AUC of 0.92 in the Mayo test set and 0.88 in external validation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center; on pre-emptive ECGs — taken six to eighteen months before clinical diagnosis — AUCs were 0.86 and 0.81 respectively. That pre-diagnostic discrimination is the device's central clinical claim: pulmonary hypertension is routinely diagnosed years after symptom onset, and an algorithm that flags risk from ECGs already on file could compress that interval. The clearance itself rests on a separate retrospective validation of 21,066 adult patients presenting with dyspnea across five US health systems, reporting 73 percent sensitivity and 74.4 percent specificity. As of the review date this study is described in the manufacturer's clearance announcement and FDA submission but has not been located in a peer-reviewed venue. The gap between the development AUCs and the cleared operating point is worth understanding in procurement review: an AUC of 0.92 describes ranking ability across all thresholds, while the cleared configuration is a single threshold tuned for a symptomatic population. The manufacturer has additionally reported a real-world analysis in which the algorithm identified more than 85 percent of pulmonary arterial hypertension patients and 78 percent of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients from ECGs taken between symptom onset and diagnosis; this, too, is company-reported rather than peer-reviewed. No randomised or prospective interventional evidence — whether earlier notification actually shortens time to right heart catheterisation or improves outcomes — has been published as of the review date.
| Study | Design | n | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DuBrock HM, Wagner TE, Carlson K, et al. (manufacturer-authored; Mayo Clinic development + VUMC external validation) | RetrospectiveRetrospective | 259,227 | — | — | 0.92 Mayo test / 0.88 VUMC (diagnostic); 0.86 / 0.81 (pre-emptive, 6-18 months prior) | European Respiratory Journal, 2024;64(1):2400192 |
| FDA 510(k) validation — five US health systems (company-reported; not yet located in a peer-reviewed venue) | RetrospectiveRetrospective | 21,066 | 73% | 74.4% | — | K252360 submission, 2026; per the manufacturer's clearance announcement |
Inside the algorithm
Editorial featureHow the ECG-AI PH algorithm reaches a verdict.
Five stages — from raw input to verdict — drawn from manufacturer documentation and the public regulatory record.
- INGEST
- NORMALISE
- DETECT
- LOCALISE
- VERDICT
Stage 01 · INGEST
A routine 12-lead ECG is read from the systems where it already lives.
The algorithm takes as input a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram — the same acquisition performed millions of times a year in primary care, cardiology clinics and emergency departments. Per the manufacturer's description it integrates with EHR and ECG management systems and runs within the health-system environment, without transferring patient data outside it. No dedicated hardware, additional acquisition or special protocol is required, which is the premise of the device: pulmonary hypertension risk signals are mined from data the health system already collects.
Input
12-lead ECG
Inference
Per-ECG, background
Inside the Auris+ Listing
Five more sections complete this device’s Auris+ Listing.
Decision Ledger
ProPro unlocks a private, cross-vendor log of every case you read on this device — what the AI called, what you concluded, and a one-line reason if you overrode it. Ready for the EU AI Act's deployer logging obligations when they land in 2028.
Clinical Evidence Deep Dive
ProPro unlocks the structured clinical-evidence summary — study count, target patient population, and a tabular accuracy-metrics view drawn from peer-reviewed sources.
Peer-Reviewed Publications
ProPro unlocks the curated peer-reviewed publication list with PubMed cross-links — the citation backbone of every editorial verdict.
Post-Market & Regulatory Conditions
ProPro unlocks the post-market surveillance summary, recall record, and the conditions of approval that bound real-world use.
AI Algorithm Version History
ProPro unlocks the chronological record of algorithm version changes — what changed when, drawn from manufacturer changelogs and regulatory filings.
Regulatory Approvals
K252360
Class II
Safety Record
No recalls, FDA safety communications or published adverse-event reports involving the device were identified in publicly available sources as of August 2026; the MAUDE database could not be queried directly from this environment, so this should be read as "none found in public reporting" rather than an exhaustive audit. The device was cleared in March 2026, so the post-market record is necessarily short. As a notification-only aid the harm surface is bounded but real in both directions: a false notification can trigger unnecessary echocardiography or invasive right heart catheterisation, while at 73 percent cleared sensitivity roughly a quarter of true cases in the validation population produced no notification — the absence of a flag must not defer a clinically indicated work-up.
Intended Use & Indications
The ECG-AI PH algorithm is a cardiovascular machine learning-based notification software device cleared in the United States under product code SAT (21 CFR 870.2380). It analyses a routine 12-lead ECG already in the health system's records and raises a notification when it detects patterns associated with pulmonary hypertension, so that clinicians can consider earlier work-up — typically echocardiography and, definitively, right heart catheterisation. It does not output a diagnosis, a haemodynamic estimate, or a treatment recommendation. The clinical rationale is the well-documented diagnostic delay in pulmonary hypertension: symptoms are non-specific and the mean interval from symptom onset to diagnosis is measured in years, by which point disease is often advanced. Because the input is the standard 12-lead ECG rather than a dedicated acquisition, the algorithm can be applied wherever ECGs already accumulate. Per the manufacturer, the software integrates with EHR and ECG management systems and runs within the health-system environment without transferring patient data; those deployment claims are the manufacturer's own and commercial deployments are not yet independently documented. Procurement reviewers should note the regulatory footprint is US-only as of the review date, the cleared performance profile (73 percent sensitivity, 74.4 percent specificity in adults presenting with dyspnea) positions the device as a case-finding aid rather than a rule-out test, and the definitive diagnostic pathway for pulmonary hypertension — right heart catheterisation — is unchanged by a notification either way.